Did Mathilde Do The "Right Thing?"
The short story "The Necklace" written by Guy de Maupassant causes readers to question if the dynamic main character, Mathilde, could be considered someone who has done the "right thing" or not. In the story, Mathilde misplaces what she presumes to be an expensive necklace and spends ten years of her life working to cover up her lie to her generous friend. Had Mathilde been honest from the start, she would have discovered that the necklace was a fake, and would have spared her and her husband a decade of misery and poverty. Mathilde's immediate reaction upon losing the necklace was for her to replace it and lie to her friend. This reveals that she does not value honesty. She prefers to not have someone mad at her than to be truthful with someone who trusted her.
Situational Irony in "The Necklace"
Situational irony is present throughout the story and has a strong influence on deciding whether or not Mathilde's actions were righteous. When she first realizes the necklace is lost, the audience might expect her to simply apologize to Madame Forestier, but she does the opposite and tells her husband they must borrow money to replace it. Years later, when Mathilde runs into Madame Forestier, she unexpectedly tells the story of her hardships, without anticipating her friend's reaction. Once Madame Forestier reveals the necklace was a fake, and all of Mathilde's and Loisel's hard work was for nothing, it is evident that Mathilde should have been honest from the start.


Janie, it is clear that you believe Mathilde did the right thing.
ReplyDeleteJanie, it is clear that you believe Mathilde did the right thing.
ReplyDelete